, ,

,

recently, the supervision commission of Chengdu Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection reported five typical cases of corruption and work style in the field of poverty alleviation.

Yang Wenbin, former deputy secretary of the Party committee and head of Guangming Township, Pujiang County, and Yang Yong, former member of the Party committee and deputy head of the township, did not strictly approve the allocation of special funds for poverty alleviation. On February 15, 2015, without knowing the payment method of poverty alleviation project funds with Pujiang County Water Affairs Bureau, Yang Wenbin and Yang Yong agreed to lend funds to the construction party in the form of loan slip, which put the poverty alleviation funds at the risk of loss. Yang Wenbin is not strict in audit and supervision and management, so he is responsible for the important leadership; Yang Yong is not able to perform the supervision duties and audit is not strict, so he is mainly responsible for this. In December 2019, Yang Wenbin and Yang Yong were respectively warned by the party.

and

comments on

and

by the supervision office of the Party style and government style of the supervision committee of Pujiang County Commission for Discipline Inspection. Yang Wenbin and Yang Yong, as township leaders, did not strictly examine and approve the allocation of special funds for poverty alleviation, signed at random, violated work discipline, did not perform their duties correctly, did not strictly audit the financial work, and did not supervise and manage in place, resulting in the risk of loss of special funds for poverty alleviation. This case reflects that the work style of individual leading cadres is floating, violates the party’s discipline, and the management of poverty alleviation special funds is not strict and mere formality. Leading cadres at all levels should earnestly take poverty alleviation as a political task, enhance their responsibility, strictly abide by the rules of discipline, strictly guard against formalism and bureaucracy, and ensure the implementation of fund management and other work.

Deng Chunmin, Secretary of the general Party branch of Baishan village, Youxin Town, Jintang County, and sun Pinggao, leader of the board of supervisors, failed to perform their duties. In 2017, Baishan village of Jintang County implemented the municipal financial special poverty alleviation (mobile funds) pumping station construction and road leveling project. Sun Pinggao failed to carefully check the qualification documents of the bidding company in the specific qualification examination of the bidding company, resulting in three enterprises without corresponding qualification participating in the bidding, and one of them won the bid, causing adverse effects. In May 2020, sun Pinggao was criticized and educated. As the person in charge of the project, Deng Chunmin failed in the audit and was investigated for the responsibility of the leader and was treated with admonition and conversation.

and

comments on

and

by the supervision office of the Party style and government style of the supervision commission of Jintang County Commission for Discipline Inspection, sun Pinggao and Deng Chunmin, as the responsible persons for the specific audit of bidding projects, should have locked up “double insurance” for the project supervision, but violated the relevant work discipline and took the form of supervision. The two “defense lines” were “lost” one after another, which brought adverse effects to the poverty alleviation work. This case reminds us that some party members and cadres do not have a strong sense of responsibility, fail to perform their legal duties seriously, and ignore the bidding procedures. The year 2020 is the end of the poverty alleviation campaign. Party members and cadres at all levels should learn from cases and take warning from them. They should shoulder the responsibility of poverty alleviation with a strict and profound work style. All discipline inspection and supervision organs (Institutions) should continue to focus on corruption and style of work in the field of poverty alleviation, strengthen supervision and inspection, seriously investigate and handle accountability, and provide strong disciplinary guarantee for decisive victory in poverty alleviation.

and

is the problem that Pan Shuhua, the director of Shuili village, the former ancient town of Pidu District, failed to perform his duties. In August 2016, pan Shuhua, as the site representative of the project employer, failed to perform the on-site supervision and management responsibilities and failed to grasp the construction progress of the project in the process of being entrusted to supervise and manage the poverty alleviation project in the village, which led to the wrong payment of project funds by the village committee. In December 2019, pan Shuhua was warned by the party.

,

, ,

,

comments on

As a party member cadre,

Pan Shuhua, as a member of the party, does not strictly supervise the poverty alleviation and development projects in the village, and violates the work discipline. In the process of being entrusted to supervise and manage the poverty alleviation projects, there are dereliction of duty and unclear understanding of the construction situation of the poverty alleviation projects, which leads to the wrong payment of project funds by the village committee, resulting in adverse effects. This case once again exposed that some units and Party members and cadres still had weak sense of purpose and discipline, insufficient responsibility, and did not make it a habit to “conform to laws and procedures”. The construction of work style is always on the way. We should be in awe, take the case as a reference, cast loyalty to the party into the thought, into the soul, see in action, constantly improve the political position, focus on the specific manifestations of formalism and bureaucracy in the work of poverty alleviation, and continue to maintain an overwhelming trend.

Huang Zhian, director of the village committee of Wudong village, Jiangyuan town, Jianyang City, is not strict in checking the data of poverty alleviation projects. In 2016, during the process of acceptance and submission for approval of the 2016 project, Huang Zhian did not seriously perform his duties and did not strictly check the data review, resulting in the obvious discrepancy between the actual site construction and the settlement report, with the reduction rate of more than 20%. In March 2020, Huang Zhian was admonished to talk.

comments on

As the director of the village committee and the person in charge of the poverty alleviation project, Huang Zhian of

should have performed his duty conscientiously and tried his best to do practical things for the masses. However, in the acceptance work of poverty alleviation projects, he became a mere formality, which damaged the vital interests of the masses. It also objectively reflected that there are still formalism and bureaucratism problems such as non responsibility and inaction of individual cadres. This case reminds us that, as Party members and cadres, we should firmly establish a sense of serving the people, earnestly undertake their duties and fulfill their duties, resolutely overcome formalism and bureaucracy, start from small things, and get through the “last mile” of serving the masses with real and practical work results, so as to continuously improve the sense of gain and satisfaction of the masses.

Wang Feng, member of the former Shuanggui road sub district Party Working Committee and Minister of the Armed Forces Department, and Wu Zheng, chief of the public service section, failed to perform their duties and responsibilities in promoting the docking and assistance work. In 2019, according to the work deployment of the municipal and district party committees, the Tibet aid office of Jinjiang District requires all streets to actively mobilize social forces in their jurisdiction to establish a pair of assistance mechanism with the aided towns and townships in Luhuo county. After Shuanggui road sub district signed a donation agreement with the recipient town of Luhuo County, Wu Zheng, as the direct manager of the project, and Wang Feng, as the leader in charge, failed to actively coordinate and solve the specific difficulties and problems encountered in the implementation of the agreement, resulting in the failure of the agreed donation funds to be in place in time, which affected the smooth development of the Tibet aid work. March 2020Wu Zheng was admonished and Wang Feng was reminded by the conversation.

and

comments on

by the supervision office of the Discipline Inspection Commission of Jinjiang District The case of

reflects that some units and Party members and cadres do not pay enough attention to the decision-making and deployment of the Party Central Committee and the State Council on winning the battle against poverty and the work arrangement of the higher authorities. They have the thought of dealing with things and muddling along. They lack the tenacity of grasping to the end, starting from the beginning to the end, and exposing the problems of lax and unrealistic work style, idleness and carelessness, dereliction of duty and dereliction of duty. This year is the year of building a well-off society in an all-round way and the realization of the 13th five year plan. It is also the end of poverty alleviation. Party members and cadres should learn from the cases, draw inferences from other cases, draw lessons from others, further improve their political positions, strengthen their political responsibilities, resolutely overcome the “fatigue syndrome”, and spare no effort to promote the implementation of various work arrangements in a pragmatic and solid style We will ensure that we will win the battle against poverty in an all-round way as scheduled. “